- the education and training needs of common ownership community boards and new and prospective owners of homes in common ownership communities;
- alternative dispute resolution services for common ownership communities;
- the desirability of adopting the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act;
- issues facing aging common ownership communities;
- issues relating to the collection of assessments; and
- issues relating to the resale of homes located in common ownership communities.
Education and Training
With regard to education of homeowners and boards of directors, the Task
Force recommended the creation of a state-sponsored and approved web site
regarding the rights and responsibilities of living in a common ownership
community. The Task Force also recommended that the Maryland Higher
Education Commission provide affordable educational materials and services
on what it means to be a homeowner living in a common ownership community
and what it means to be a member of a board governing such communities.
Additionally, the Task Force recommended that a brochure regarding the
rights and responsibilities of living in a common ownership communities be
distributed through real estate agents, lenders and title companies.
Alternative Dispute Resolution
The Task Force recommended that local governments, either individually or
through regional groupings, be required to consider offering common
ownership community alternative dispute resolution services, such as ombuds
programs, mediation, arbitration, and administrative hearings. Additionally,
the Task Force recommended that common ownership communities consider
internal dispute resolution systems to promote collaborative approaches to
conflict resolution.
The Task Force also recommended that local governments coordinate
referral of disputes involving alleged violations of state common ownership
community laws to the Office of Attorney General for review and appropriate
enforcement action.
Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act
Amendments to the 1994 version of the Uniform Common Interest Ownership
Act (“1994 UCIOA”) -- model legislation recommended by the National
Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (“NCCUSL”) -- are
currently under consideration of the UCIOA subcommittee of NCCUSL. The Task
Force has recommended that further consideration of UCIOA as a model
for amending Maryland common ownership community laws be deferred until
after a final revised version of the 1994 UCIOA has been issued by NCCUSL.
Similarly, the Task Force recommended deferring further consideration of a
"homeowners bill of rights" since that subject is also under consideration
by the NCCUSL UCIOA subcommittee..
Aging Communities
Developer Transition. The Task Force made several
recommendations regarding transition from developer control to homeowner
control in common ownership communities. The recommendations include:
- an independent reserve study should be prepared and paid for by the developer;
- the developer should transfer reserve funds based upon unsold units/lots owned by the developer and the developer may not pay less into reserves per unit/lot than other owners;
- the developer should be required to supply the homeowner-controlled board with a
list of all common elements and all contracts;
- homeowner-controlled boards should be given the right to reject the transfer of common elements if incomplete or not reasonably useable by the community (such as small strips of land between two homes); and
- an independent audit of funds transferred to the homeowner-controlled board should be conducted to ensure that the developer has contributed the proper amount.
Replacement Reserves. The Task Force also recommended that the
board of directors of a common ownership community be required to conduct a
reserve study at least once every five years to determine the amount and
necessity of reserves for anticipated capital replacements, repairs and
improvements. The reserve study should be reviewed annually to determine the
amount of reserves to be included in the budget for such replacements to
maintain adequate reserves for such replacements.
Governing Documents. The Task Force determined that many older
common ownership communities are severely restricted as to how often they
may change their governing documents and the percentage of owners required
to approve such changes. Accordingly, the Task Force recommended that a law
be passed to permit every common ownership community to amend its governing
documents at least once every five years, and to permit approval of any
amendment by the affirmative vote of not more than 66-2/3% of all owners or
such lesser majority of owners as may be provided for in the association’s
governing documents.
Statutory Exemptions. Additionally, the Task Force recommended
that, to the extent feasible, common ownership communities currently exempt
from any portion of the state common ownership community laws should be
phased in so that current and future laws regarding common ownership
communities apply to all communities and any exemption for older communities
be eliminated.
Manager Licensing. With regard to common ownership communities
which hire outside management companies, the Task Force recommended that the
management companies be licensed by the State of Maryland and should be
required to post a bond in order to obtain a license. The bond is intended
to protect common ownership communities by providing recourse in the event
of financial losses caused by the management company.
Receivership. Based upon its finding that some common ownership
communities are “dysfunctional”, the Task Force recommended that an owner be
permitted to file a court petition to place the community in receivership
under supervision of the court.
Insurance Deductibles. With regard to condominium insurance
deductibles, the Task Force noted that existing law allows up to $1,000 of
the condominium insurance deductible for property damage losses to be
shifted to the unit owner under certain circumstances. The Task Force
recommended that the current $1,000 cap on the property insurance deductible
be increased to $10,000.
Collection of Assessments
The Task Force recommended that common ownership community assessments be
given lien priority as of the date of recording in the land records of the
declaration or other document that authorized the imposition and collection
of assessments by the common ownership community. The lien priority would be
limited to an amount equal to six months’ worth of delinquent assessments,
plus any late fees, attorneys’ fees, and costs of suit, if authorized under
the declaration or other governing document.
The Task Force also recommended that all common ownership communities be
given statutory authority to institute policies for suspension of privileges
of delinquent owners provided that such policies are set forth in a document
recorded in the land records. Additionally, the Task Force recommended that
owners with a "bona fide dispute" with a common ownership community be given
the right to file an assessment escrow action and pay assessments to a court
administered account until judicial resolution of the dispute.
Resale of Homes
With regard to resale of homes in common ownership communities, the Task
Force recommended that disclosure requirements be made uniform for all kinds
of common ownership communities with regard to time deadlines and the
contents of such disclosures, to the maximum extent possible.
Additionally, the Task Force recommended that the homeowner association
depository requirements be extended to condominiums and housing
cooperatives. All common ownership communities would be required to update
their depository filings at least annually.
Proposed Legislation
During the 2007 legislative session of the Maryland General Assembly, it
is anticipated that numerous bills will be introduced to implement various
Task Force recommendations.
The full Task Force report can be obtained from the website of the
Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development,
www.dhcd.state.md.us.
Back to LawLetter Menu
